ANALISIS KOMPARATIF INDEKS SILIKA DAN KALSIT: MANUAL DENGAN PHREEQC LAPANGAN PANAS BUMI

Authors

  • Pradhika Shakti Saputra Politeknik Energi dan Mineral Akamigas
  • Akhmad Sofyan Departmen of Geology, Faculty of Earth Science, University of Szeged
  • Muchtia Burhana Politeknik Energi dan Mineral Akamigas
  • Diyah Rosiani Politeknik Energi dan Mineral Akamigas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53026/prosidingsntem.v5i1.682

Keywords:

indeks saturasi silika, indeks saturasi kalsit, PHREEQC, scaling panas bumi

Abstract

Prediksi potensi scaling panas bumi memerlukan perhitungan indeks saturasi yang akurat, namun validasi empiris metode manual versus simulasi geokimia terhadap data lapangan aktual masih terbatas. Penelitian ini memvalidasi akurasi komparatif metode Fournier-Rowe (SSI) dan stoikiometri (CSI) terhadap simulasi PHREEQC menggunakan observasi scaling aktual dari Sumur DEF-07, Lapangan XYZ, periode Mei-September 2024. Hasil menunjukkan untuk SSI, kedua metode konsisten memprediksi saturasi dengan deviasi 13,43% (manual: 0,99-1,17; PHREEQC: 1,19-1,26), keduanya sesuai dengan observasi silika scaling aktual 2-3 mm/bulan. Validasi kuantitatif menunjukkan PHREEQC lebih akurat (error 9,7%) dibanding manual (error 18,2%). Untuk CSI, terjadi kontradiksi fundamental dimana manual memprediksi supersaturated (CSI +0,007-0,008) sementara PHREEQC memprediksi undersaturated (CSI -2,19 hingga -1,61). Validasi lapangan 5 tahun mengkonfirmasi tidak ada kalsit scaling, membuktikan PHREEQC akurat sementara metode manual menghasilkan false positive 100% dengan error >200%. Root cause analysis mengidentifikasi tiga faktor: ketidakmampuan koreksi Ksp terhadap temperatur tinggi (error +1,6 log), pengabaian koefisien aktivitas pada kekuatan ionik tinggi (error +1,5 log), dan penyederhanaan spesiasi karbonat (error +1,6 log). Decision framework berbasis validasi dikembangkan: metode manual acceptable untuk monitoring SSI harian dengan error tolerance 15-20%, namun PHREEQC wajib untuk CSI. Strategi integrasi kedua metode dapat mengurangi biaya analisis 77% sambil mempertahankan akurasi prediksi.

References

A. Sofyan, H. S. Aka, B. Y. Suranta, dan S. M. A. Ratasya, "Analysis of Scale Saturation Index (SSI), Scale Formation Rate, and Scale Formation Time Based on Geothermal Production Well Head Pressure at Well X," Indonesian Journal of Energy and Mineral, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 26-33, 2021.

A. Sofyan, J. Szanyi, dan A. S. Hari, "Investigation of Zone and Type of Scaling Based on the Fluid Flow Pattern in the Geothermal Well X at the Salak Geothermal Field-Indonesia," International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 192-202, 2024.

S. N. Salim, D. Winardhi, dan S. Widodo, "Analisis Potensi Scaling pada Sistem Panas Bumi menggunakan Metode Geokimia," Jurnal Teknologi Mineral dan Batubara, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 115-128, 2020.

R. O. Fournier dan J. J. Rowe, "The solubility of amorphous silica in water at high temperatures and high pressures," American Mineralogist, vol. 62, pp. 1052-1056, 1977.

A. Sofyan, S. Wiharti, J. Szanyi, B. Yudho Suranta, dan R. Njeru, "Determination of Scaling Zone and Scaling Type in Slotted Liner Based on the Fluid Flow Pattern in the Geothermal Well X," International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 276-286, 2023.

W. A. Duffield dan J. H. Sass, "Geothermal Energy: Clean Power from the Earth's Heat," U.S. Geological Survey Circular, vol. 1249, pp. 1-43, 2003.

D. L. Parkhurst dan C. A. J. Appelo, "Description of input and examples for PHREEQC version 3—A computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations," U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 6, chap. A43, pp. 1-497, 2013

C. A. J. Appelo dan D. Postma, "Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution," 2nd ed., Rotterdam:

A.A. Balkema Publishers, 2005.

A. Sofyan, H. S. Aka, A. M. Rizaldy, dan B. Y. Suranta, "Development of Indonesian Wellhead Generating Unit (Small Scale) Based on Legal and Regulation of PT. Geo Dipa XYZ: A Case Study," dalam 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Science and Technology (BIS-STE 2020), Atlantis Press, Aug. 2020, pp. 72-82.

PHREEQC (Version 3)—A Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-Reaction, OneDimensional Transport, and Inverse Geochemical Calculations, U.S. Geological Survey, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.usgs.gov/software/phreeqc-version-3

J. Cohen, "Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences," 2nd ed., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.

A. Sofyan, Y. D. G. Bujang, dan D. C. Dewi, "Analysis Of The Z Well Production Test Using The Horizontal Lip Pressure Method At PT. Pertamina Geothermal Energy Ulubelu Area,"Indonesian Journal of Energy and Mineral, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 40-55, 2023.

W. F. Giggenbach, "Geothermal solute equilibria. Derivation of Na-K-Mg-Ca geoindicators,"Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 2749-2765, 1988.

A. Sofyan, H. S. Aka, dan M. B. Ermanda, "Redesign Of Well Pad X Geothermal Separator with Demister Pad to Increase Separator Efficiency to Get Maximum Steam and Brine Separation in the Field Y," dalam Der Digital German Geothermie Kongress 2020, pp. 1-15, 2020.

A. Sofyan, R. Jaya, H. Susanto, R. M. Njeru, G. Bozsó, dan J. Szanyi, "Scale Treatment Planning Using Broaching Method in a Vapor-Dominated Geothermal Well X at Kamojang Geothermal Field," Eng, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 67, 2025.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

ANALISIS KOMPARATIF INDEKS SILIKA DAN KALSIT: MANUAL DENGAN PHREEQC LAPANGAN PANAS BUMI. (2025). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Energi Dan Mineral, 5(1), 1051-1061. https://doi.org/10.53026/prosidingsntem.v5i1.682

Similar Articles

1-10 of 45

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>